Effective Resourcing Models in Talent Acquisition: The Flexibility You Need

At a recent roundtable dinner in London, hosted by HR World and Sanderson Government and Defence a group of HR professionals gathered to discuss the current hot topics in talent acquisition. One prominent theme was the diverse range of resourcing models currently employed within the sector. The discussion covered what these models are, their implications for businesses, and how they can incorporate inclusive approaches to talent selection.

In this article, Nick Walrond, Managing Director of Sanderson Government and Defence, shares insights on the models discussed and provides a detailed overview of the various resourcing models available in talent acquisition today.

Talent Acquisition Resourcing Models

In recent years, companies have sought more efficient ways to access the talent they need, leading many to diversify their offerings to create more effective and tailored services. This evolution has resulted in three broad categories of resourcing models:

1. Inhouse – Talent acquisition services are managed entirely by an internal team.
2. Outsourcing – Talent acquisition is outsourced to a third party, either operated offsite and off-brand or through a white-labelled team utilising your brand.
3. Hybrid – A mix-and-match approach where both internal and external service providers operate alongside each other to meet talent needs.

Let’s explore each of these models in more detail.

The Inhouse Model

An Inhouse model involves setting up internal systems and processes to efficiently handle candidate processing and comply with GDPR requirements for managing personal data. This model necessitates hiring skilled talent acquisition experts and implementing an Applicant Tracking System (ATS), at a minimum.

Advantages:

• The talent acquisition team is fully embedded within the company culture and values, ensuring they understand the organisation’s strategic objectives.
• Enhanced relationships with the talent acquisition team allow for better retention of business information and strong working relationships, leading to the identification of the best candidates.
• Direct engagement with the community being hired for provides a seamless recruitment service.
• Maintains the employer brand throughout the process, making candidates feel connected to the organisation from the start.
• Ownership of candidate data enables proactive engagement with talent pools, particularly beneficial for niche or scarce skills.

Challenges:

• Resource and cost-intensive, often requiring augmentation by external niche and specialist providers.
• Navigating the myriad candidate sourcing routes available can be complex and costly.
• Scaling the inhouse model is challenging, especially during sudden demand surges or natural attrition of talent acquisition experts.

The Outsourcing Model

In the Outsourcing model, recruitment services are managed entirely outside the organisation. The outsourcer handles everything from vacancy approval to onboarding and retention strategies, using their own systems and platforms. This model can operate under the outsourcer’s brand or utilise the client’s brand.

Advantages:

• Flexible pricing model ensures you only pay for the services you use.
• Extended reach to multiple candidate attraction tools and techniques.
• Can provide cost-effective solutions without the need for significant internal investment in people, processes, and systems.

Considerations:

• Deciding whether an externally branded or inhouse branded approach works best.
• Determining ownership of data associated with candidate attraction capability.

The Hybrid Model

The Hybrid model combines elements from both the inhouse and outsourcing models, offering flexibility to invest in an inhouse team while leveraging external partners when needed.

Advantages:

• Flexibility to scale up or down based on demand and support niche roles requiring different approaches.
• Customisable processes to meet business needs with the best resourcing model for each recruitment requirement.
• Potential for a strong partnership with external suppliers, viewed as an extension of the internal talent acquisition team.

Challenges:

• Increased complexity due to the need to bridge the gap between internal teams and multiple external vendors.
• Requires substantial communication and coordination to ensure seamless operation.

Conclusion

The variety of resourcing models in talent acquisition provides organisations with the flexibility to reach a more diverse talent pool and appeal to a wider range of candidates. The best solution for each organisation depends on its specific talent and business requirements, and the chosen method should align with the business’s strategic objectives moving forward.

Ultimately, successful talent acquisition hinges on selecting a model that suits all parties and fosters an inclusive approach to sourcing and hiring the best talent.

Do you have any follow up questions regarding these recruitment models? Or have found yourself wondering which might be the best option for your business?

Then please don’t hesitate to get in touch so we can chat more about your recruitment needs and the bespoke solutions myself and the Sanderson team could provide you in your recruitment processes.

Would you like to hear more from Sanderson and learn about the work we do? You can sign up to join our mailing list here for a variety of updates, access to our market leading salary benchmarking data, white papers, reports and blogs PLUS our latest news and event invites.